Forums The Vibe Chat Whats happend to Squat Juice?

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 31 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1037497
    Me
    Participant

      ??

      #1069994
      Col
      Participant

        some tithead was DOSing the server and the host got pissed off so they need to find a new host

        wont be back until mid next week earliest

        #1070005
        Me
        Participant

          seen

          #1069989
          Techno Viking
          Participant

            squatjuice.jpg

            #1070004
            bumpkinbeans
            Participant

              at least now they can,t rip the piss out of us from norfolk .what are all the clickey crew that frequent s juice gonna do now ??some of them live on there 24 seven .

              #1069993
              General Lighting
              Moderator

                that norfolk slating is way out of hand – started as a joke but these things go way too far as when people argue they forget their security and say things that help cops find out who is doing what.

                its very worrying though that anyone takes an argument so far to essentially get a site closed down –

                its odd and rather suspicious though that SJ gets knocked out over a big weekend for ravers….I wonder if its anti-rave vigilantés? farmers and landowners use the net as well…

                #1070008
                CT23
                Participant

                  How the fek did slating Norfolkers get the site kicked off the server?

                  Whats DOSing?

                  :rant:

                  :toxic:VOTE LABOUR

                  #1070017
                  dan u
                  Participant
                    CT23 wrote:
                    How the fek did slating Norfolkers get the site kicked off the server?

                    Whats DOSing?

                    :rant:

                    :toxic:VOTE LABOUR

                    shagging family members and assorted animals and broadcasting it via webcam

                    allegedly

                    #1070011
                    random-raver
                    Participant
                      Me!!! wrote:
                      ??

                      monster.jpg

                      Murderation…..:toxic:

                      #1070003
                      K_trina
                      Participant
                        Site wrote:
                        squatjuice.jpg

                        i DNT HAVE THAT COMMING UP…IT GIVES ME A PAGE WITH ALL DIFFERENT FILES i CNA GO INTO.

                        #1069997
                        djvu
                        Participant

                          I recon one of these hilly billys sent a carrier pigion to a internet cafe, in a city more civalised city than there own and this pigion hopped about and sent bare spam and feathers towards sj towers and gave it a dose of bird flu

                          #1069998
                          djvu
                          Participant

                            its odd and rather suspicious though that SJ gets knocked out over a big weekend for ravers….I wonder if its anti-rave vigilantés? farmers and landowners use the net as well…

                            I did think that to

                            #1070016
                            clackstaan
                            Participant
                              djvu wrote:
                              I recon one of these hilly billys sent a carrier pigion to a internet cafe, in a city more civalised city than there own and this pigion hopped about and sent bare spam and feathers towards sj towers and gave it a dose of bird flu

                              Hahaha

                              bare spam

                              #1069992
                              JE5
                              Participant
                                djvu wrote:
                                its odd and rather suspicious though that SJ gets knocked out over a big weekend for ravers….I wonder if its anti-rave vigilantés? farmers and landowners use the net as well…

                                I did think that to

                                Or pigs..

                                #1069999
                                TigerMoff
                                Participant
                                  CT23 wrote:
                                  How the fek did slating Norfolkers get the site kicked off the server?

                                  Whats DOSing?

                                  :rant:

                                  :toxic:VOTE LABOUR

                                  I dont believe it had much to do with Norfolk but this is the defination of DOS attacks:

                                  Short for denial-of-service attack, a type of attack on a network that is designed to bring the network to its knees by flooding it with useless traffic. For all known DoS attacks, there are software fixes that system administrators can install to limit the damage caused by the attacks.

                                  The comany who owns the server prolly got pissed off with their server going down again and told SJ that they didnt want their custom anymore. IT may have affected other customers such as companies who would be a little pissed off thier website was down.

                                  #1070000
                                  TigerMoff
                                  Participant
                                    JE:5 wrote:
                                    Or pigs..

                                    I believe the server is not located in this country so the OB wont have the authority to bring it down. I doubt if they would want to. Its prolly their best resource for illegal parties, tho recently the gallery has been removed and most rigs don’t post their parties in the announcements section.

                                    SJ really has become too popular for its own good.

                                    I think it was just one of the numpties who knows how to hack got a good ripping off SJ and decided to bring it down.

                                    #1070009
                                    CT23
                                    Participant

                                      Duz any1 know 4 sure?

                                      I thought maybe the admin had removed it becoz of the bankholday weekend partys/ legal stuff ect

                                      This place looks more randomly fun I think

                                      HtMl in posts – proper bo

                                      #1070006
                                      Acidplumber
                                      Participant

                                        whats the govenment fucking with this week then ct23?

                                        #1070010
                                        CT23
                                        Participant
                                          Negroponte also told TIME that three dozen or so of the worst al-Qaeda terrorists held in secret CIA prisons are likely to remain in captivity as long as the “war on terror continues.” He added, “These people are being held. And they’re bad actors. And as long as this situation continues, this war on terror continues, I’m not sure I can tell you what the ultimate disposition of those detainees will be.” Negroponte’s comments appear to be the first open acknowledgement of the secret U.S. detention system and the fact that captives such as Khalid Shaikh Mohammad — involved in Sept. 11 or other major attacks on U.S. interests around the world — may be held indefinitely.

                                          also

                                          Even more farcical was the fact that the “investigation” into the July 7 bombings was hindered when it was discovered the CCTV cameras on the bus that blew up were not working.

                                          http://infowars.net/articles/april2006/170406watching.htm

                                          and finally

                                          Charlie Sheen Says Media Complicit In 9/11 Cover-Up
                                          Response to Kimmel appearance betrays unparalleled willful ignorance
                                          Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | April 17 2006
                                          Charlie Sheen has hit back against the predictable establishment response to his Jimmy Kimmel Live appearance by asking why they failed to address the two core issues he mentioned, the five frames of the Pentagon footage and Building 7. Sheen accuses the media of being complicit in the 9/11 cover-up.
                                          The response to Charlie Sheen’s Friday night appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live (VIDEO) again underscores the blind ignorance of the establishment media in their treatment of the 9/11 subject as well as their blatant deception in claiming Sheen has little public support.
                                          Sheen limited his focus to just two issues, the Pentagon and Building 7.
                                          “There are two areas,” said Sheen, “Building 7 and the five frames from the Pentagon. Don’t listen to me, do your own research,” Sheen stated on the ABC show.
                                          But every single hit piece has failed to adequately discuss either.
                                          According to recent developments in the Moussaoui trial, family members were shown video of the impact of Flight 77. Why is that footage so sensitive that it has not been released publicly? Or was the footage just a repeat of the five amorphous frames that have provoked so many questions?
                                          The National Ledger website has so relentlessly attacked Sheen that it looks like they are now doing so only to try and attract attention. Despite this, today’s tirade fell flat on its face again in refusing to address the main tenets of Sheen’s argument. The writer also confused Charlie Sheen with Tom Cruise, as can be seen from the screenshot below, hardly a mistake that would fill one with confidence as to their focus and journalistic credibility.

                                          sheen_nat_ledge1.jpg

                                          While attempting to state that Sheen is trying to come forward with a mea culpa The Ledger can’t even keep straight that its Sheen not Tom Cruise who is brave enough to ask questions about 9/11.
                                          Furthermore, The Ledger cites the cockpit recordings of Flight 93 as evidence to debunk Sheen’s claims. For a start Sheen has not even discussed Flight 93 or used it to illustrate his argument. Secondly, the Flight 93 cockpit recordings, assuming they are genuine, contradict the official contention that the ‘let’s roll’ heroes bravely crashed the plane, preventing it from finding a higher profile target.
                                          This completely contradicts a speech made by President Bush on May 8 2002.
                                          “I think the most telling event on September 11th, and one that I hope a lot of people remember, is what happened on Flight 93. Basically, what I’m saying is, it’s important to serve something greater than yourself in life. It’s important to serve a call greater than yourself and a cause greater than yourself. Flight 93, we had average citizens flying across the country, and they realized their plane was fixing to be used as a weapon on the Nation’s Capital. They called their loved ones on the phone. They said a prayer and told them they loved them, said a prayer, and they drove the plane in the ground to serve something greater than themselves. That’s the American spirit I know. That’s that sense of sacrifice that makes this country so strong.”
                                          If you believe the Flight 93 transcripts the only people who drove the plane into the ground were the hijackers.
                                          The Ledger tries to slam Sheen, stating:
                                          “No one cares if Charlie Sheen has questions.”
                                          “But when you make outrageous claims with nothing more than propaganda to back up said claims – expect to be attacked. Other people get to speak as well – and Sheen needs to understand that.”
                                          “Sheen is allowed to have his questions – and folks in the media are allowed to challenge him and indeed label him a tin foil hat wearing “Hollywood nut.”
                                          He brought nothing serious to the table to debate.
                                          Quite to the contrary, Sheen asserted only (as he has ever done) that he has questions about things that “don’t make sense,” and wants to see more attention given to these questions that many people share. His statements during the Jimmy Kimmel interview were not a mea culpa, but a hardline stance reclaiming his right as an American citizen to question authority.
                                          Despite what many might have you believe about Sheen, the people are with him.
                                          Charlie Sheen personally gave his response to Jim Roberts’ Ledger piece.
                                          “Hey Jim – Why did you so carefully yet obviously OMIT my two specific focal points, Building 7 and the 5 frames from the Pentagon, in your story, despite numerous quotes from the Kimmel piece interwoven throughout?”
                                          “Like so many others, chances are you took a look for yourself and realized the evidence is far too credible. I’m all for an honest debate. However, manipulating or distorting such irrefutable data prevents anything of the sort from occurring. There is nothing “tiny” about this movement. Do a little more research before you spew forth such blatant inaccuracies.”
                                          “It’s actually inspiring to witness this level of media arrogance and complicity – it so clearly illustrates a radical and baseline climate of fear. Fear perhaps, of the TRUTH… I wish you well in your travels.”
                                          We will wait and see if The Ledger even publishes Sheen’s rebuttal, something the Guardian refused to do.
                                          The most egregious of the spin appears on Slashfilm where the site states that, “The public attacked Sheen after asking questions about 9/11 on a national radio show. The general viewpoint being that he was just an actor, what right does he have to make such accusations.”

                                          While Sheen does indicate that he was attacked for his comments during the interview, it was in fact the media that attacked his brave stance and not the public. The public’s outcry, as measured by several polls conducted by CNN and others, had been very much in favor of Sheen and his willingness to put his career on the line and speak truth to power. Even during the interview on the Jimmy Kimmel Live program, the crowd responded with a powerful and sustained round of applause when Sheen again raised his questions about 9/11.
                                          In an article recently published by Scripps-Howard News Service, Journalist Betsy Hart notes the incredible response she first received when covering the Sheen 9/11 story, “I started getting inundated with e-mails. They implored or demanded that I consider Sheen’s “evidence” of a government conspiracy.”
                                          This is a cheap attempt to skew the incredible, positive response from people all over the country who viewed Sheen’s statements on 9/11 as a courageous and important act.
                                          Far from becoming a shrinking violet, Charlie Sheen has now gone one step further in his defiant stance on 9/11. After the media failed to respond to his invitation to challenge him on the facts, he is now pointing a finger at the media for collaborating in the cover-up of 9/11.
                                          “The mainstream media’s blatant attempt to suffocate and censor my specific points of interest i.e. Building 7 and the five frames from the Pentagon, illustrates their transparent and desperate role as accomplices to the 9/11 cover up,” Sheen told Alex Jones.
                                          Proof of this censorship has again come from Google’s quarters, following their refusal to index any articles concerning Sheen’s appearance on The Alex Jones Show, a policy that was later reversed, we have again run into a black hole in terms of Google’s failure to index Infowars or Prison Planet articles concerning Sheen’s appearance on Kimmel (listing only a temporary cache of our main index pages).
                                          Will Google continue to impose a blackout or, as in other cases, will they relent under pressure?
                                          Will the mainstream attack dogs continue to whimper like poodles or will they actually engage Sheen in a real debate?

                                          #1070002
                                          DJ Khemica
                                          Participant
                                            Col wrote:
                                            some tithead was DOSing the server and the host got pissed off so they need to find a new host

                                            wont be back until mid next week earliest

                                            When SJ find a new host, does that mean we all have to re-register and we lose all our post counts from before the site went down?

                                            Don’t mean to ask a dumb question, but I don’t have a scooby about computer stuff…:neutral: and I was just wondering if that would be the case.

                                            #1069995
                                            Col
                                            Participant
                                              DJ Khemica wrote:
                                              When SJ find a new host, does that mean we all have to re-register and we lose all our post counts from before the site went down?

                                              Don’t mean to ask a dumb question, but I don’t have a scooby about computer stuff…:neutral: and I was just wondering if that would be the case.

                                              PM Jon Tooth

                                              he’s the man with the answers :laugh_at:

                                              #1070013
                                              andy ridgeway
                                              Participant

                                                it wouldn’t be the first time a rave website has voluntarily taken itself offline over a bank holiday, in order to ensure the nobends who feel obliged to blab about everything on the net, are denied…

                                                🙂

                                                #1069990
                                                Techno Viking
                                                Participant
                                                  andy ridgeway wrote:
                                                  it wouldn’t be the first time a rave website has voluntarily taken itself offline over a bank holiday, in order to ensure the nobends who feel obliged to blab about everything on the net, are denied…

                                                  🙂

                                                  For sure but it’d be back by now obviously if it had been…

                                                  #1070007
                                                  Jon_tooth
                                                  Participant
                                                    Col wrote:
                                                    PM Jon Tooth

                                                    he’s the man with the answers :laugh_at:

                                                    You git, Col.

                                                    :bigsmile:

                                                    No one will lose their accounts, or their posts – everything is backed up.

                                                    They are just moving everything to another server.

                                                    #1070014
                                                    andy ridgeway
                                                    Participant
                                                      Site wrote:
                                                      For sure but it’d be back by now obviously if it had been…

                                                      unless they fancied a break from it for a couple of days

                                                      just a thought.

                                                      the timing seems a bit how you say, synchronicitous otherwise?

                                                      😮 😉

                                                    Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 31 total)
                                                    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

                                                    Forums The Vibe Chat Whats happend to Squat Juice?