Forums The Vibe Subscribers Upgrades

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 33 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1043321
    Techno Viking
    Participant

      Just so you know, what’s going today isn’t wholy unexpected because I upgraded some elements of the morning. Anyway I’ve been chasing bugs all day but we’re getting there…

      #1151400
      Techno Viking
      Participant

        I reverted and all is well again. I guess the version of vbulletin we’re running isn’t quite fully compatible and especially not some of the custom code we’re using…

        #1205902
        Techno Viking
        Participant

          I reverted and all is well again. I guess the version of vbulletin we’re running isn’t quite fully compatible and especially not some of the custom code we’re using…

          #1151413
          Raj
          Participant

            :group_hug:group_hug:group_hug:group_hug:group_hug

            Nightmare for you :flowers: take a deep breath :group_hug

            #1205925
            Raj
            Participant

              :group_hug:group_hug:group_hug:group_hug:group_hug

              Nightmare for you :flowers: take a deep breath :group_hug

              #1151410
              SdZ
              Participant

                Are you getting some strange error about ‘Illegal Division by Zero on Calendar.php line blah blah’ ?

                Ive been trying to migrate Level 1 to the new server and i just cant get past this annoying error!

                #1205920
                SdZ
                Participant

                  Are you getting some strange error about ‘Illegal Division by Zero on Calendar.php line blah blah’ ?

                  Ive been trying to migrate Level 1 to the new server and i just cant get past this annoying error!

                  #1151401
                  Techno Viking
                  Participant

                    I haven’t had that but we’re running older code which is probably quite different. What’s the exact error? I’ll see what I can dig up for you…

                    #1205904
                    Techno Viking
                    Participant

                      I haven’t had that but we’re running older code which is probably quite different. What’s the exact error? I’ll see what I can dig up for you…

                      #1151406
                      General Lighting
                      Moderator

                        incidentally I’ve noticed a few blog entries recently berating open source software developers of applications with interpreted languages like PHP, Asterisk etc for deprecating syntax so often (and thus breaking code that was working perfectly in previous versions :you_crazy)

                        #1205913
                        General Lighting
                        Moderator

                          incidentally I’ve noticed a few blog entries recently berating open source software developers of applications with interpreted languages like PHP, Asterisk etc for deprecating syntax so often (and thus breaking code that was working perfectly in previous versions :you_crazy)

                          #1151402
                          Techno Viking
                          Participant

                            I know it’s a right pain! The result of my testing is we can’t upgrade unless we also move to a newer version of vBulletin but we’re heavily moded which it makes prohibitive unless there’s something worth gaining from it which there isn’t…

                            #1205906
                            Techno Viking
                            Participant

                              I know it’s a right pain! The result of my testing is we can’t upgrade unless we also move to a newer version of vBulletin but we’re heavily moded which it makes prohibitive unless there’s something worth gaining from it which there isn’t…

                              #1151411
                              SdZ
                              Participant

                                Were on 3.6 at level 1 and it seems fine. Were running PHP5 already on both servers but when i move the server from one machine to another it seems to work fine apart from the calendar warnings.

                                I might take advantage of vBulletin support and get them to login and have a play.

                                I try to not install too many mods cause of the issues it causes when upgrading etc..

                                #1205922
                                SdZ
                                Participant

                                  Were on 3.6 at level 1 and it seems fine. Were running PHP5 already on both servers but when i move the server from one machine to another it seems to work fine apart from the calendar warnings.

                                  I might take advantage of vBulletin support and get them to login and have a play.

                                  I try to not install too many mods cause of the issues it causes when upgrading etc..

                                  #1151414
                                  Raj
                                  Participant

                                    custom mods are a screaming nightmare :hiding: we have a lot of custom skins etc on the dc and upgrading it to release candidate 3 gold is something we are dreading but will have to do. we are planning to install a shadow forum and play with that till it works right – then we will get the staff to log in and poke around to see whats broken until we are happy with it. we have a fraction of your users so you have my sympathy about upgrades :group_hug

                                    :flowers: guys the sites both look great 😉 though

                                    #1205927
                                    Raj
                                    Participant

                                      custom mods are a screaming nightmare :hiding: we have a lot of custom skins etc on the dc and upgrading it to release candidate 3 gold is something we are dreading but will have to do. we are planning to install a shadow forum and play with that till it works right – then we will get the staff to log in and poke around to see whats broken until we are happy with it. we have a fraction of your users so you have my sympathy about upgrades :group_hug

                                      :flowers: guys the sites both look great 😉 though

                                      #1151407
                                      General Lighting
                                      Moderator
                                        Raj wrote:
                                        custom mods are a screaming nightmare :hiding:

                                        Every time I get a source code update for the telephone system I am building, I have to manually patch raw C code just to get caller ID to display on “internal” calls between sites (as BT send a peculiar ringing pattern down the line for these calls, thus confusing the software which when set to “UK mode” merely expects to “hear” a standard UK ringing pattern.

                                        Someone put in a kludge to stop the box clearing down the line (which is what it did previously) but it broke caller ID on these calls.

                                        I found out how to stop it but the patch is out of date compared to current source code so I had to find the insertion point by inspecting the code!

                                        one missing “{” or “}” and the whole lot is fucked and the code is nested loops actually doing DSP in software (something I barely understand)

                                        managed to sort it in the end but it just shows how the moment you do custom stuff it all becomes a bit more complex…

                                        #1205914
                                        General Lighting
                                        Moderator
                                          Raj wrote:
                                          custom mods are a screaming nightmare :hiding:

                                          Every time I get a source code update for the telephone system I am building, I have to manually patch raw C code just to get caller ID to display on “internal” calls between sites (as BT send a peculiar ringing pattern down the line for these calls, thus confusing the software which when set to “UK mode” merely expects to “hear” a standard UK ringing pattern.

                                          Someone put in a kludge to stop the box clearing down the line (which is what it did previously) but it broke caller ID on these calls.

                                          I found out how to stop it but the patch is out of date compared to current source code so I had to find the insertion point by inspecting the code!

                                          one missing “{” or “}” and the whole lot is fucked and the code is nested loops actually doing DSP in software (something I barely understand)

                                          managed to sort it in the end but it just shows how the moment you do custom stuff it all becomes a bit more complex…

                                          #1151412
                                          SdZ
                                          Participant

                                            I think ive nailed it!

                                            I was exporting the DB without adding a couple of arguments :

                                            mysqldump –opt -Q -uUSERNAME -p DATABASENAME > /PATH/TO/DUMP.SQL

                                            Simple as that. Grrrr its always something simple!

                                            Looks like i can move the server to the new faster machine at last. Should improve the load when busy. :weee:

                                            #1205923
                                            SdZ
                                            Participant

                                              I think ive nailed it!

                                              I was exporting the DB without adding a couple of arguments :

                                              mysqldump –opt -Q -uUSERNAME -p DATABASENAME > /PATH/TO/DUMP.SQL

                                              Simple as that. Grrrr its always something simple!

                                              Looks like i can move the server to the new faster machine at last. Should improve the load when busy. :weee:

                                              #1151415
                                              Raj
                                              Participant
                                                SdZ wrote:
                                                I think ive nailed it!

                                                I was exporting the DB without adding a couple of arguments :

                                                mysqldump –opt -Q -uUSERNAME -p DATABASENAME > /PATH/TO/DUMP.SQL

                                                Simple as that. Grrrr its always something simple!

                                                Looks like i can move the server to the new faster machine at last. Should improve the load when busy. :weee:

                                                its always something small and annoying – well done SdZ for finding it 🙂

                                                #1205929
                                                Raj
                                                Participant
                                                  SdZ wrote:
                                                  I think ive nailed it!

                                                  I was exporting the DB without adding a couple of arguments :

                                                  mysqldump –opt -Q -uUSERNAME -p DATABASENAME > /PATH/TO/DUMP.SQL

                                                  Simple as that. Grrrr its always something simple!

                                                  Looks like i can move the server to the new faster machine at last. Should improve the load when busy. :weee:

                                                  its always something small and annoying – well done SdZ for finding it 🙂

                                                  #1151403
                                                  Techno Viking
                                                  Participant
                                                    General Lighting wrote:
                                                    Every time I get a source code update for the telephone system I am building, I have to manually patch raw C code just to get caller ID to display on “internal” calls between sites (as BT send a peculiar ringing pattern down the line for these calls, thus confusing the software which when set to “UK mode” merely expects to “hear” a standard UK ringing pattern.

                                                    Someone put in a kludge to stop the box clearing down the line (which is what it did previously) but it broke caller ID on these calls.

                                                    I found out how to stop it but the patch is out of date compared to current source code so I had to find the insertion point by inspecting the code!

                                                    one missing “{” or “}” and the whole lot is fucked and the code is nested loops actually doing DSP in software (something I barely understand)

                                                    managed to sort it in the end but it just shows how the moment you do custom stuff it all becomes a bit more complex…

                                                    You should see the utter load shit we’re trying to roll out at work for VOIP…

                                                    #1205908
                                                    Techno Viking
                                                    Participant
                                                      General Lighting wrote:
                                                      Every time I get a source code update for the telephone system I am building, I have to manually patch raw C code just to get caller ID to display on “internal” calls between sites (as BT send a peculiar ringing pattern down the line for these calls, thus confusing the software which when set to “UK mode” merely expects to “hear” a standard UK ringing pattern.

                                                      Someone put in a kludge to stop the box clearing down the line (which is what it did previously) but it broke caller ID on these calls.

                                                      I found out how to stop it but the patch is out of date compared to current source code so I had to find the insertion point by inspecting the code!

                                                      one missing “{” or “}” and the whole lot is fucked and the code is nested loops actually doing DSP in software (something I barely understand)

                                                      managed to sort it in the end but it just shows how the moment you do custom stuff it all becomes a bit more complex…

                                                      You should see the utter load shit we’re trying to roll out at work for VOIP…

                                                    Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 33 total)
                                                    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

                                                    Forums The Vibe Subscribers Upgrades