Forums The Vibe Chat Sarah’s Law – what do you think?

Viewing 5 posts - 51 through 55 (of 55 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1089760
    quietRIOT
    Participant

      hey….coool:love:

      #1089774
      chillidog
      Participant
        april wrote:
        you know…chillidog..raaa……. this thread will run an run coz there is such strong feelin about what should be done about nonses…i say hang em some say reabilitate..the petetions a good thing some think not……so on it goes…..:yawn: :crazy_dru

        :satisfied had my say so im going to shut up about it now,as you said feelings run high on the subject but everyone has a right to their own opinions and i totally respect that,as i hope others do. :egg:

        #1089784
        Angel
        Moderator

          The story of Megan’s Law

          _41780760_megan203.jpg Megan Kanka was murdered

          The possibility of Britain adopting US-style “naming and shaming” of paedophiles living in the community has been raised by Home Secretary John Reid.
          Mr Reid is sending a minister to the US to examine the legislation – known as Megan’s Law.
          American parents – unlike their UK counterparts – have access to information on paedophiles living in their local area.
          The law was signed by President Bill Clinton in 1997 and has since been adopted in some form by all 50 states.
          It arose from the rape and murder of seven-year-old Megan Kanka.
          She was killed by Jesse Timmendequas, a known child molester with two previous convictions for sexual offences.
          He had moved into the same neighbourhood as her family without their knowledge.
          The murder caused outrage in the US and Megan’s mother campaigned for a change in the law to give parents access to information on child sex offenders in their area.

          Parents must now be informed when offenders move into their neighbourhood after being freed from prison.

          Divided opinions
          A number of states list offenders’ details on the internet, allowing parents to enter their own details to check if anyone on the register has moved in nearby.
          Supporters of the law point to cases where registered sex offenders have been discovered working in amusement parks, youth counselling and other activities involving contact with children.
          One Californian grandmother told how she had checked the database after growing suspicious that her daughter-in-law, and mother of her four grandchildren, had re-married a convicted sex offender.
          “I said, ‘What if he’s a rapist?’ and sure as hell, he was.”
          But opponents argue the law encourages acts of vigilantism and does not give offenders who have paid their dues the chance to merge back into society.
          They also question the effectiveness of Megan’s Law. Past studies have shown that far fewer paedophiles comply with registration requirements in the US than in the UK.
          Critics also point out that most cases of child abuse occur within the family, and suggest that victims may stay silent if they know a family member will be denounced.
          State differences
          Offenders must register their address with the local police upon release from prison, but many give bogus details.
          Others have given their details, but travelled outside their local areas to prey on youngsters in neighbourhoods where no-one knew about them.
          The law takes different forms in different states.
          In Louisiana, the public has complete access to information on offenders and their movements.
          One company offers e-mail alerts to families warning of sex offenders moving to homes near them.
          In Washington state, law enforcement officers can call at every house in the neighbourhood to warn people about an offender moving in.
          Sex offenders in Oregon can be forced to display a sign in their windows. Some believe that Megan’s Law does not go far enough and several states are investigating the use of, or have already introduced, chemical or surgical castration for certain sexual offenders.

          shim.gif Arabic Armenian Cambodian Chinese English Japanese Korean Portuguese Punjabi Russian Spanish Tagalog Vietnamese Megan’s Law – Information on Registered Sex Offenders
          Welcome to the California Department of Justice’s Internet web site, which lists designated registered sex offenders in California.

          As a result of a new law, this site will provide you with access to information on more than 63,000 persons required to register in California as sex offenders. Specific home addresses are displayed on more than 33,500 offenders in the California communities; as to these persons, the site displays the last registered address reported by the offender. An additional 30,500 offenders are included on the site with listing by ZIP Code, city, and county. Information on approximately 22,000 other offenders is not included on this site, but is known to law enforcement personnel.

          Once you have read and acknowledged the disclaimer on the next page, you may search the database by a sex offender’s specific name, obtain ZIP Code and city/county listings, obtain detailed personal profile information on each registrant, and use our map application to search your neighborhood or anywhere throughout the State to determine the specific location of any of those registrants on whom the law allows us to display a home address.

          Not all sex offenders have been caught and convicted. Most sex offenses are committed by family, friends or acquaintances of the victim.

          It looks like this

          [SIZE=+3]W[/SIZE]ashington State’s 1990 Community Protection Act included America’s first law authorizing public notification when dangerous sex offenders are released into the community. However, it was the brutal 1994 rape and murder of seven-year-old Megan Kanka that prompted the public demand for broad based community notification. On May 17, 1996, President Clinton signed Megan’s Law. Megan’s Law requires the following two components:
          Sex Offender Registration – The 1994 Jacob Wetterling Act requires the States to register individuals convicted of sex crimes against children. Sex offender registration laws are necessary because:
          • Sex offenders pose a high risk of re-offending after release from custody;
          • Protecting the public from sex offenders is a primary governmental interest;
          • The privacy interests of persons convicted of sex offenses are less important than the government’s interest in public safety;
        • Release of certain information about sex offenders to public agencies and the general public will assist in protecting the public safety.
        Community Notification – Megan’s Law allows the States discretion to establish criteria for disclosure, but compels them to make private and personal information on registered sex offenders available to the public. Community notification:

        • Assists law enforcement in investigations;
        • Establishes legal grounds to hold known offenders;
        • Deters sex offenders from committing new offenses;
      • Offers citizens information they can use to protect children from victimization.
      • Our interactive Megan’s Law map is color coded to reflect Internet access of community notification laws to better serve America’s evolving, fast paced, transient society. Young parents considering day care providers or businesses and organizations whose employees or volunteers have unsupervised access to children require this critical information so that they can make informed choices based on the best information available.

        In order to remain current and maintain relevance we ask the public to provide updated information that we may have overlooked, including new, broken or invalid web links so that the KlaasKids Foundation can continue to be the Internet’s premiere Megan’s Law destination.
        Accessing Megan’s Law – International Efforts – http://www.forsarah.com/html/mainpage.html
        Updated 7/10/06
        [SIZE=+1]Alabama [/SIZE]

        [SIZE=+1]

        [/SIZE]

        [SIZE=+1]Michigan [/SIZE]

        [SIZE=+1]

        [/SIZE]

        statemap4.gif

        [SIZE=-1]Alabama — 4,757 updated 4/22/05[/SIZE]

        [SIZE=-1]

        Alaska — 2,902 updated 3/31/06
        Arizona — 13,412 as of 4/28/06
        Arkansas — 6,545 updated 5/2/06
        California — 87,060 updated 4/1/06
        Colorado — 9,426 updated 3/27/06
        Connecticut — 4,219 updated 5/26/06
        Delaware — 3,067 updated 4/6/06
        Florida — 31,674 updated 3/13/06
        Georgia — 12,419 updated 4/22/05
        Hawaii — 1,957 updated 5/12/06
        Idaho — 2,834 updated 3/31/06
        Illinois — 18,018 updated 5/1/06
        Indiana — 7,300 updated 4/22/05
        Iowa — 6,111 updated 5/1/06
        Kansas — 4,139 updated 4/4/06
        Kentucky — 5,653 updated 4/23/06
        Louisiana — 7,069 updated 5/5/06

        [/SIZE]

        [SIZE=-1]Maine — 2,282 updated 4/1/06[/SIZE]

        [SIZE=-1]

        Maryland — 4,366 updated 4/24/06
        Massachusetts — 18,000 updated 4/22/05
        Michigan — 38,936 updated 5/2/06
        Minnesota — 14,000+ updated 1/1/06
        Mississippi — 3,989 updated 7/7/06
        Missouri — 11,411 updated 4/7/06
        Montana — 3,513 updated 3/30/06
        Nebraska — 2,270 updated 4/7/06
        Nevada — 12,329 updated 5/26/06
        New Hampshire — 3,357 updated 4/3/06
        New Jersey — 10,464 updated 4/22/05
        New Mexico — 1,959 updated 5/15/06
        New York — 22,818 as of 4/10/06
        North Carolina — 9,897 updated 5/8/06
        North Dakota — 1,126 updated 7/10/06

        [/SIZE]

        [SIZE=-1]Ohio — 15,436 updated 5/12/06[/SIZE]

        [SIZE=-1]

        Oklahoma — 5,507 updated 4/22/05
        Oregon — 17,336 updated 2/28/06
        Pennsylvania — 8,245 updated 4/28/06
        Rhode Island — 1,400 updated 4/28/06
        South Carolina — 8,898 updated 4/6/06
        South Dakota — 2,139 updated 5/10/06
        Tennessee — 9,019 updated 4/5/06
        Texas — 46,484 updated 4/22/05
        Utah — 6,830 updated 5/2/06
        Vermont — 2,382 updated 5/4/06
        Virginia — 12,472 updated 4/10/06
        Washington — 18,943 updated 3/31/06
        Washington, D.C. — 637 updated 3/31/06
        West Virginia — 2,400 updated 5/2/06
        Wisconsin — 18,000 updated 4/6/06

        Wyoming — 1001 updated 7/10/06

        [/SIZE]

        Source for State Megan’s Law Grade Number of Registrants – Parents for Megan’s Law


        #1089770
        Raj
        Participant

          Mother’s Mark’s Law plea to MSPs

          The mother of a schoolboy murdered by a sex offender has told MSPs he would still be alive if families knew where paedophiles were living. Margaret Ann Cummings has been campaigning for parents to be told if there are registered sex offenders living in their area.
          Her son Mark, eight, was murdered by Stuart Leggate who lived in the same tower block in Glasgow in 2004.
          MSPs on a Scottish parliamentary sub committee are considering the issue.
          Since her son’s death, Ms Cummings has been campaigning for the introduction of what has been dubbed Mark’s Law.
          It would allow parents to get information on child sex offenders living in their neighbourhood.
          ‘Going underground’
          Ms Cummings, who was wearing a T-shirt with a picture of her murdered son on it, told MSPs: “I believe in my heart and soul Mark would still be alive today if Stuart Leggate knew parents were watching and on a more basic level my son would know to stay away from him.
          “Neither myself or Mark had the information needed to stop his death.
          “The current system for monitoring sex offenders is not working.”
          Mark’s Law also calls for a review of where sex offenders are housed and for tougher sentences for paedophiles.
          Ms Cummings added: “I didn’t ask for any of this to happen, it haunts me everyday and I don’t want any other family to suffer the way we have suffered.”


          Some MSPs on the Justice 2 committee questioned her proposals.
          Jackie Baillie, the convener of the committee, raised concerns that disclosing the details of sex offenders could simply lead to them going underground.
          Tory MSP Alex Fergusson told how a sex offender in his Galloway and Upper Nithsdale constituency had been hounded from various homes, until he was forced to live anonymously.
          Meanwhile Labour MSP for East Lothian, John Home Robertson, pointed out it was easy for offenders to move from one area to another.
          Therefore he argued that giving parents information about people in a limited area may give them a false sense of security.
          SNP justice spokesman Kenny MacAskill said in many cases where children were abused the perpetrator was not a convicted paedophile but was instead someone known to the victim.

          http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/glasgow_and_west/5402714.stm

          #1089771
          Raj
          Participant

            The disappearance of 24 sex offenders should not fuel demands for new laws giving families the right to know their whereabouts, an expert has said. Professor George Irving, who conducted a review of the sex offenders’ register, said he was not surprised police had lost track of offenders.
            He said the offenders were not under 24-hour surveillance or high security.
            Professor Irving’s review of the operation of the sex offenders’ register recommended closer scrutiny.
            Professor Irving told BBC Scotland that it should be remembered that the offenders were living in the community and, from time to time, some would go missing.
            ‘Not complacent’
            “It is a matter of concern, but we must be realistic about it – not complacent, but realistic,” he said.
            On Thursday, the Scottish Executive disclosed that authorities do not know the whereabouts of 24 people on the sex offenders’ register in Scotland.
            Police believe half of them may have gone overseas.
            The executive said the 24 represented only a tiny fraction of the 3,230 people on the register.
            Professor Irving, of Glasgow Caledonian University, said police had done an “excellent” job of supervising those on the register, with very few powers.
            “My report intends to increase these powers and to reduce these risks and the number of missing persons,” he added.

            http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/5413040.stm

            Viewing 5 posts - 51 through 55 (of 55 total)
            • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

            Forums The Vibe Chat Sarah’s Law – what do you think?