› Forums › The Vibe › Subscribers › I think our scene is going totally pearshaped
- This topic has 102 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated January 16, 2008 at 9:26 pm by GiantMidget.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 5, 2007 at 12:30 am #1145771General Lighting wrote:Exodus were/are from the “crossover” area between East Anglia/SE England.
yeh, but that was way before the economic boom you talked of weren’t it? like in luton n all that? all i know is on the documentary it showed wat glo was talkin about, they drew together ‘cos they had a rough time of it n the people went to the parties cos of that
spiral tribe (no less respect to em) were a loada posh boys, werent they?
December 5, 2007 at 12:43 am #1124809boothy wrote:yeh, but that was way before the economic boom you talked of weren’t it? like in luton n all that? all i know is on the documentary it showed wat glo was talkin about, they drew together ‘cos they had a rough time of it n the people went to the parties cos of thatLuton may be a shithole but its proximity to both London and East Anglia (and having an airport) meant that there was still money around. Even at the depths of a recession an airport area or transport hub will always have work as people might want to get the fuck out of the place (Reading, being a gateway to Heathrow, was in a similar situation during the early 90s),plus essential goods like food etc will still need to come in.
Also Glenn Jenkins is a fucking excellent spin doctor, way better than anything the govt could dream up, he did a good job of selling the dream of communal living (pity the collective couldn’t actually deliver the goods first time round!)
ironically the peak of exodus’s time (and the most recent rise in the rave scene as a whole) was actually around the time of the dot-com boom (1994-2001). Although the CJA got passed around then the Tories had starved the cops of the resources needed to actually enforce it.
this is the paradox.
Whilst the economy was booming, the rest of society didn’t care so much about people jumping around in fields and warehouses, as there seemed to be lots of spare resources. it didn’t matter to the farmer if a few crops were trampled as he was doing well and the govt were giving out loads of subsidies on top of his profits. it didn’t matter to the property managers that the warehouses were getting rinsed, as they had been simply abandoned by companies expanding to bigger and better premises.
it didn’t matter to middle england as even they weren’t that grumpy, despite a bit of moaning about travellers/squatters people were getting away with loads of stuff (my mates squatted a new building every month and got away with it). We’d often have buildings for entire winters…
but at the same time people started taking the parties for granted, and losing the solidarity within their crews…
Quote:spiral tribe (no less respect to em) were a loada posh boys, werent they?a lot of the original acid house lot were. I was your age when it all started and no fucking way could I afford pills at £20 each and £25 tickets to get into raves, nor the money for foreign travel. They teamed up with loads of people like East london gangsters and foreign people to get the drugs in what funded the scene,and the growing drugs market brought down the prices and provided the resources
December 5, 2007 at 12:43 am #1145734boothy wrote:yeh, but that was way before the economic boom you talked of weren’t it? like in luton n all that? all i know is on the documentary it showed wat glo was talkin about, they drew together ‘cos they had a rough time of it n the people went to the parties cos of thatLuton may be a shithole but its proximity to both London and East Anglia (and having an airport) meant that there was still money around. Even at the depths of a recession an airport area or transport hub will always have work as people might want to get the fuck out of the place (Reading, being a gateway to Heathrow, was in a similar situation during the early 90s),plus essential goods like food etc will still need to come in.
Also Glenn Jenkins is a fucking excellent spin doctor, way better than anything the govt could dream up, he did a good job of selling the dream of communal living (pity the collective couldn’t actually deliver the goods first time round!)
ironically the peak of exodus’s time (and the most recent rise in the rave scene as a whole) was actually around the time of the dot-com boom (1994-2001). Although the CJA got passed around then the Tories had starved the cops of the resources needed to actually enforce it.
this is the paradox.
Whilst the economy was booming, the rest of society didn’t care so much about people jumping around in fields and warehouses, as there seemed to be lots of spare resources. it didn’t matter to the farmer if a few crops were trampled as he was doing well and the govt were giving out loads of subsidies on top of his profits. it didn’t matter to the property managers that the warehouses were getting rinsed, as they had been simply abandoned by companies expanding to bigger and better premises.
it didn’t matter to middle england as even they weren’t that grumpy, despite a bit of moaning about travellers/squatters people were getting away with loads of stuff (my mates squatted a new building every month and got away with it). We’d often have buildings for entire winters…
but at the same time people started taking the parties for granted, and losing the solidarity within their crews…
Quote:spiral tribe (no less respect to em) were a loada posh boys, werent they?a lot of the original acid house lot were. I was your age when it all started and no fucking way could I afford pills at £20 each and £25 tickets to get into raves, nor the money for foreign travel. They teamed up with loads of people like East london gangsters and foreign people to get the drugs in what funded the scene,and the growing drugs market brought down the prices and provided the resources
December 5, 2007 at 12:53 am #1124825General Lighting wrote:these days its also not a “chance” of a run in with the police, but a determined effort to clamp down using 3 police forcesin YOUR area, but not in most
December 5, 2007 at 12:53 am #1145750General Lighting wrote:these days its also not a “chance” of a run in with the police, but a determined effort to clamp down using 3 police forcesin YOUR area, but not in most
December 5, 2007 at 12:57 am #1124810globalloon wrote:in YOUR area, but not in mostits a big area though and in a place where large raves were tolerated or at least endured for the longest time by the rest of society (there are loads of old posts on here about Biotech raves and the Ridgeway ones). A quarter of the country has gone zero tolerance in the last 5 years…
December 5, 2007 at 12:57 am #1145735globalloon wrote:in YOUR area, but not in mostits a big area though and in a place where large raves were tolerated or at least endured for the longest time by the rest of society (there are loads of old posts on here about Biotech raves and the Ridgeway ones). A quarter of the country has gone zero tolerance in the last 5 years…
December 5, 2007 at 1:01 am #1124846General Lighting wrote:its a big area though and in a place where large raves were tolerated for the longest time (there are loads of old posts on here about Biotech raves and the Ridgeway ones). A quarter of the country has gone zero tolerance in the last 5 years…sounds pretty shit for ravers there
will it change? surely things start to loosen up a bit sooner or later?
December 5, 2007 at 1:01 am #1145772General Lighting wrote:its a big area though and in a place where large raves were tolerated for the longest time (there are loads of old posts on here about Biotech raves and the Ridgeway ones). A quarter of the country has gone zero tolerance in the last 5 years…sounds pretty shit for ravers there
will it change? surely things start to loosen up a bit sooner or later?
December 5, 2007 at 1:04 am #1124811boothy wrote:sounds pretty shit for ravers therewill it change? surely things start to loosen up a bit sooner or later?
Norfolk (cops) do let stuff happen still (they only clamp down for stupidity like Kan using in use warehouses), even Thames Valley which is supposed to be on zero tolerance has let a fair few happen, but cops are only half the problem.
The other is the organisation being way sketchier than even 3 or 4 years ago, and people barely older than yourself already burning out through too much drugs, friendships falling apart etc.. I get the impression a lot of people are “going through the motions” rather than enjoying the parties like they once were..
Oh, and gangs rather than Scotland yard was what has fucked over the London scene (its driven many crews back into legal venues or made them quit altogether)
December 5, 2007 at 1:04 am #1145736boothy wrote:sounds pretty shit for ravers therewill it change? surely things start to loosen up a bit sooner or later?
Norfolk (cops) do let stuff happen still (they only clamp down for stupidity like Kan using in use warehouses), even Thames Valley which is supposed to be on zero tolerance has let a fair few happen, but cops are only half the problem.
The other is the organisation being way sketchier than even 3 or 4 years ago, and people barely older than yourself already burning out through too much drugs, friendships falling apart etc.. I get the impression a lot of people are “going through the motions” rather than enjoying the parties like they once were..
Oh, and gangs rather than Scotland yard was what has fucked over the London scene (its driven many crews back into legal venues or made them quit altogether)
December 5, 2007 at 1:15 am #1124826General Lighting wrote:Luton may be a shithole but its proximity to both London and East Anglia (and having an airport) meant that there was still money around. Even at the depths of a recession an airport area or transport hub will always have work as people might want to get the fuck out of the place (Reading, being a gateway to Heathrow, was in a similar situation during the early 90s),plus essential goods like food etc will still need to come in.so you go from a proud living to serving coffee or unloading a truck for significantly less than what is now minimum wage and travelling hours for the privilege. if your bus is late, you get the formal warning. you can’t be saying that the early 90’s were a prosperous time in england. the biggest recession in generations. the largest number of families losing their homes.
having a shit, dead-end job and living in crap rented accomodation or homeless is struggling, relatively speaking. that was the reality for many people in the 90’s.
my own father, oxford educated and at the top of his game, was forced to leave the country, or spend the rest of his life paying off bankruptcy for working hard for 30 years to be a top FE teacher and trying to buy a modest house
i was homeless for much of the 90s. even when i had work it was so unreliable i couldn’t get a deposit to rent a room. living in london in 95 i sometimes had to sleep in the street and wash where i could when i had a pretty responsible job
there’s another recession on right now. banks collapsing. borrowing has outstripped the countries GDP. essential goods, like food, will only arrive while they are paid for
in the meantime, we rave on and use the party platform to build friendships and networks that will outlast our economy
if you were around at the ‘start of it all’ you know it didn’t start with raving, it started with displaced people creating an alternative to debt. here we are 3 decades later and the same conditions are coming into play
December 5, 2007 at 1:15 am #1145751General Lighting wrote:Luton may be a shithole but its proximity to both London and East Anglia (and having an airport) meant that there was still money around. Even at the depths of a recession an airport area or transport hub will always have work as people might want to get the fuck out of the place (Reading, being a gateway to Heathrow, was in a similar situation during the early 90s),plus essential goods like food etc will still need to come in.so you go from a proud living to serving coffee or unloading a truck for significantly less than what is now minimum wage and travelling hours for the privilege. if your bus is late, you get the formal warning. you can’t be saying that the early 90’s were a prosperous time in england. the biggest recession in generations. the largest number of families losing their homes.
having a shit, dead-end job and living in crap rented accomodation or homeless is struggling, relatively speaking. that was the reality for many people in the 90’s.
my own father, oxford educated and at the top of his game, was forced to leave the country, or spend the rest of his life paying off bankruptcy for working hard for 30 years to be a top FE teacher and trying to buy a modest house
i was homeless for much of the 90s. even when i had work it was so unreliable i couldn’t get a deposit to rent a room. living in london in 95 i sometimes had to sleep in the street and wash where i could when i had a pretty responsible job
there’s another recession on right now. banks collapsing. borrowing has outstripped the countries GDP. essential goods, like food, will only arrive while they are paid for
in the meantime, we rave on and use the party platform to build friendships and networks that will outlast our economy
if you were around at the ‘start of it all’ you know it didn’t start with raving, it started with displaced people creating an alternative to debt. here we are 3 decades later and the same conditions are coming into play
December 5, 2007 at 1:32 am #1124812globalloon wrote:so you go from a proud living to serving coffee or unloading a truck for significantly less than what is now minimum wage and travelling hours for the privilege. if your bus is late, you get the formal warning. you can’t be saying that the early 90’s were a prosperous time in england. the biggest recession in generations. the largest number of families losing their homes.the early 90s weren’t a good time at all – but within a few years an artificial boom happened from the dot com days and it was at that time the underground party scene actually flourished in a lot of areas.
Though Exodus did try to publicise their ethos in the early 90s, (as did Kan) a lot of people didn’t bother looking into the wider picture of what Exodus were doing until the late 90s when they thought “hey man, they are getting away with growing weed!”
Then Exodus fucked up and didn’t deliver what they promised. Kan got themselves into heroin abuse and petty theft, hence the feds being constantly on their case to this day.
Quote:in the meantime, we rave on and use the party platform to build friendships and networks that will outlast our economyif you were around at the ‘start of it all’ you know it didn’t start with raving, it started with displaced people creating an alternative to debt. here we are 3 decades later and the same conditions are coming into play
maybe, but a lot of the people partying today no longer want to (or know how to) build the networks, especially when they involve actual hard work rather than just drugs and music and people getting together for more than 12 hours for a ketamine binge.
I was talking about “wider communities” and going beyond raving on here and SJ in 2003 and no fucker really seemed to be interested, and that situation hasn’t changed.
the rave I referred to at the start of this thread which went tits up didn’t even get hassled by cops. If people can no longer put on a positive rave in the first place even without “dirty babylon” hassling them, how on earth can they be expected to build a wider community?
December 5, 2007 at 1:32 am #1145737globalloon wrote:so you go from a proud living to serving coffee or unloading a truck for significantly less than what is now minimum wage and travelling hours for the privilege. if your bus is late, you get the formal warning. you can’t be saying that the early 90’s were a prosperous time in england. the biggest recession in generations. the largest number of families losing their homes.the early 90s weren’t a good time at all – but within a few years an artificial boom happened from the dot com days and it was at that time the underground party scene actually flourished in a lot of areas.
Though Exodus did try to publicise their ethos in the early 90s, (as did Kan) a lot of people didn’t bother looking into the wider picture of what Exodus were doing until the late 90s when they thought “hey man, they are getting away with growing weed!”
Then Exodus fucked up and didn’t deliver what they promised. Kan got themselves into heroin abuse and petty theft, hence the feds being constantly on their case to this day.
Quote:in the meantime, we rave on and use the party platform to build friendships and networks that will outlast our economyif you were around at the ‘start of it all’ you know it didn’t start with raving, it started with displaced people creating an alternative to debt. here we are 3 decades later and the same conditions are coming into play
maybe, but a lot of the people partying today no longer want to (or know how to) build the networks, especially when they involve actual hard work rather than just drugs and music and people getting together for more than 12 hours for a ketamine binge.
I was talking about “wider communities” and going beyond raving on here and SJ in 2003 and no fucker really seemed to be interested, and that situation hasn’t changed.
the rave I referred to at the start of this thread which went tits up didn’t even get hassled by cops. If people can no longer put on a positive rave in the first place even without “dirty babylon” hassling them, how on earth can they be expected to build a wider community?
December 5, 2007 at 1:44 am #1124827General Lighting wrote:I was talking about “wider communities” and going beyond raving on here and SJ in 2003 and no fucker really seemed to be interested, and that situation hasn’t changed.i think that that is bollocks. everyone, from central government, daily mail, my local labour council, the local record shop, the people in my street are desperate to build a community that goes beyond economy or single issues. saying ‘no-one is interested’ …. i organised a free festival in the city centre last month and about 50 people from dozens of crews, small and new and larger and established turned out with practical assistance, for a cause (dem yout)
Quote:the rave I referred to at the start of this thread which went tits up didn’t even get hassled by cops. If people can no longer put on a good rave in the first place, how on earth can they be expected to build a wider community?i don’t know the people you’re talking about, but it seems clear that not knowing when they had enough was the problem, not the entire scene or wider societies of people who are dreaming up alternatives to bust, boom, money-motivated life
December 5, 2007 at 1:44 am #1145752General Lighting wrote:I was talking about “wider communities” and going beyond raving on here and SJ in 2003 and no fucker really seemed to be interested, and that situation hasn’t changed.i think that that is bollocks. everyone, from central government, daily mail, my local labour council, the local record shop, the people in my street are desperate to build a community that goes beyond economy or single issues. saying ‘no-one is interested’ …. i organised a free festival in the city centre last month and about 50 people from dozens of crews, small and new and larger and established turned out with practical assistance, for a cause (dem yout)
Quote:the rave I referred to at the start of this thread which went tits up didn’t even get hassled by cops. If people can no longer put on a good rave in the first place, how on earth can they be expected to build a wider community?i don’t know the people you’re talking about, but it seems clear that not knowing when they had enough was the problem, not the entire scene or wider societies of people who are dreaming up alternatives to bust, boom, money-motivated life
December 5, 2007 at 1:52 am #1124813globalloon wrote:i think that that is bollocks. everyone, from central government, daily mail, my local labour council, the local record shop, the people in my street are desperate to build a community that goes beyond economy or single issues.sorry, but other than a few youth shelters that isn’t the case in my area (other than clampdowns on crime etc) there was a councilor claiming to be “sticking up for the youth” but he was a tory and he is on remand now for noncing young girls.#
even if people do show interest often no one can agree on the fundamentals here, stuff is talked about and delayed due to squabbling and wranglings.
anyway, its getting to the stage where other than family and a few close friends I’ve stopped caring about what happens in society any more – I’m not gonna be around much longer than 20-30 or so years on this earth (perhaps less even), and the rot won’t set in immediately – I don’t have kids so it doesn’t really matter all that much what happens..
December 5, 2007 at 1:52 am #1145738globalloon wrote:i think that that is bollocks. everyone, from central government, daily mail, my local labour council, the local record shop, the people in my street are desperate to build a community that goes beyond economy or single issues.sorry, but other than a few youth shelters that isn’t the case in my area (other than clampdowns on crime etc) there was a councilor claiming to be “sticking up for the youth” but he was a tory and he is on remand now for noncing young girls.#
even if people do show interest often no one can agree on the fundamentals here, stuff is talked about and delayed due to squabbling and wranglings.
anyway, its getting to the stage where other than family and a few close friends I’ve stopped caring about what happens in society any more – I’m not gonna be around much longer than 20-30 or so years on this earth (perhaps less even), and the rot won’t set in immediately – I don’t have kids so it doesn’t really matter all that much what happens..
December 5, 2007 at 2:04 am #1124828General Lighting wrote:anyway, its getting to the stage where other than family and a few close friends I’ve stopped caring about what happens in society any moremaybe that disqualifies you from talking about what so many of us are actually achieving. you sit back in your comfortable, secure, private sector job, funded by the tax payer, criticise the not-for-profit sector and grass roots activism, live in a lifeless area you chose to move to.
even if people do show interest often no one can agree on the fundamentals here, stuff is talked about and delayed due to squabbling and wranglings.
like what? claiming everything has gone pear shaped?
and if you really don’t care, why comment? i think you do care, even while you shout “i don’t care”. and if you really don’t care, take a break G. nothing is worse than it has ever been. adapt
December 5, 2007 at 2:04 am #1145754General Lighting wrote:anyway, its getting to the stage where other than family and a few close friends I’ve stopped caring about what happens in society any moremaybe that disqualifies you from talking about what so many of us are actually achieving. you sit back in your comfortable, secure, private sector job, funded by the tax payer, criticise the not-for-profit sector and grass roots activism, live in a lifeless area you chose to move to.
even if people do show interest often no one can agree on the fundamentals here, stuff is talked about and delayed due to squabbling and wranglings.
like what? claiming everything has gone pear shaped?
and if you really don’t care, why comment? i think you do care, even while you shout “i don’t care”. and if you really don’t care, take a break G. nothing is worse than it has ever been. adapt
December 5, 2007 at 2:11 am #1124814globalloon wrote:maybe that disqualifies you from talking about what so many of us are actually achieving. you sit back in your comfortable, secure, private sector job, funded by the tax payer, criticise the not-for-profit sector and grass roots activism, live in a lifeless area you chose to move to.I worked fucking hard for this comfort and security – I gave “grass roots activism” a try in my old city but it didn’t work out, it doesn’t seem to be working here and I think those who disagree with stuff (or some aspects of it) have a right to talk about it. isn’t that the fundamental aspect of free speech?
Quote:nothing is worse than it has ever been. adaptI did care once but I think now is the time to stop caring. Perhaps the only way to adapt is to wirte off the last few years, accept that otherwise my life is going really well and get on with MY life (but still trying to be a decent person and helping friends/family) instead of trying to “sort out the rest of society”
December 5, 2007 at 2:11 am #1145739globalloon wrote:maybe that disqualifies you from talking about what so many of us are actually achieving. you sit back in your comfortable, secure, private sector job, funded by the tax payer, criticise the not-for-profit sector and grass roots activism, live in a lifeless area you chose to move to.I worked fucking hard for this comfort and security – I gave “grass roots activism” a try in my old city but it didn’t work out, it doesn’t seem to be working here and I think those who disagree with stuff (or some aspects of it) have a right to talk about it. isn’t that the fundamental aspect of free speech?
Quote:nothing is worse than it has ever been. adaptI did care once but I think now is the time to stop caring. Perhaps the only way to adapt is to wirte off the last few years, accept that otherwise my life is going really well and get on with MY life (but still trying to be a decent person and helping friends/family) instead of trying to “sort out the rest of society”
December 5, 2007 at 2:23 am #1124829General Lighting wrote:I worked fucking hard for this comfort and security – I gave “grass roots activism” a try in my old city but it didn’t work out, it doesn’t seem to be working here and even those who disagree with stuff (or some aspects of it) have a right to talk about it.fair enough. a lot of people work hard though. some do it for comfort and security. some work for what they believe in, at the risk of hardship. but we all have our part to play
Quote:I did care once but I think now is the time to stop caring. Perhaps the only way to adapt is to wirte off the last few years, accept that otherwise my life is going really well and get on with MY life (but still trying to be a decent person and helping friends/family) instead of trying to “sort out the rest of society”if everyone took that attitude, everything really would go pearshaped overnight
December 5, 2007 at 2:23 am #1145755General Lighting wrote:I worked fucking hard for this comfort and security – I gave “grass roots activism” a try in my old city but it didn’t work out, it doesn’t seem to be working here and even those who disagree with stuff (or some aspects of it) have a right to talk about it.fair enough. a lot of people work hard though. some do it for comfort and security. some work for what they believe in, at the risk of hardship. but we all have our part to play
Quote:I did care once but I think now is the time to stop caring. Perhaps the only way to adapt is to wirte off the last few years, accept that otherwise my life is going really well and get on with MY life (but still trying to be a decent person and helping friends/family) instead of trying to “sort out the rest of society”if everyone took that attitude, everything really would go pearshaped overnight
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › The Vibe › Subscribers › I think our scene is going totally pearshaped