:laugh_at: :laugh_at: :laugh_at:

how long did you spend on that DF?

bout 5 mins lol :wink::laugh_at:

computers confuse me … paint is just another brick in the wall and the technology that surrounds the internet recieving tower that is my dell … p.v and media player are about all i can manage!

least some of us have got talent though eh!? 😉

lol .. i used to draw pics with spliffs like that all the time when i used to smoke weed … all i did was get that pic up in paint and move my mouse where i would of drawn the lines with a pen back in the day :laugh_at: ..dont really need that much tallent .. but i am glad you apreciate it 😉

without people like you my dear lad this world would be unliveable …

:love:

:love:

ket definatly needs to be moved up.. no way should it be along side weed. and neither should G. come to think of it Shrooms shouldnt be class A either..

what’s G? GHB?

The drug classification system is all over the place, quite frankly. There is no way ecstasy should be class A, for a start. It is outdated and has no scientific or social basis at all.

yup GHB.. with the potential to kill you. its a fine line between it getting you high and killing you. alot more riskier that shrooms or even MDMA. yet its alongside weed and tranquilizers..

i heard the classification system was in order of the potential of abuse and how harmful it is. like say heroin should definatly be class A coz of the addiction thing and how bad it is for your body..

sometimes I think they aren’t as stupid as you think though and its a lot more cynical and calculating

making ket class A or B would mean many dealers would think “better be hanged for a sheep than a lamb” and start importing dealing decent pills and speed again

and if GHB kills people once they are dead they are no further burden to the NHS…

now at this point this is slight “tinfoil helmet” territory but I also think that the right wing would be perfectly happy for certain junkies or other non-productive people to be able to easily end their lifes either accidentally or deliberately so they leave at least one “killer” drug easily available..

Nah mate. It’s not based on any particular order. It’s mostly “put everything in class A” when it becomes a problem, and very rarely move it down if the government frankly has no other choice.

For example:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5230006.stm

The designation of drugs in classes A, B and C should be replaced with one more closely reflecting the harm they cause, a committee of MPs has said. The Science Select Committee said the present system was based on historical assumptions, not scientific assessment.

“Perhaps most surprising is the presence of two Class A drugs – ecstasy and LSD – in the bottom six.”

I’m not saying that everyone will agree with that graph (for one, it does not separate coke and crack) but it proves the classification system is a load of outdated shit.

yep thats the other side of the coin

if MDMA went class B we would be flooded with it, might be fun for ravers in the short term until the proper old skool comedowns set in (was why a lot of people today are bang into benzos, ket or even smack)

there may be good reasons for it, even “normal” coke snorters occasionally wash up a rock or two. also its not really any different from Senior Service cigarettes (high tar cigs what may even be banned today) compared to Mayfair lights, both are classed as tobacco..

oh, and gordon brown always looks stoned because he only has one eye. the other is glass.

Got it playing rugby dint he. I thought he was a working class kid!