tilting
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
By some people’s standards I smoke quite a lot of dope, but strangely never really seem to suffer from any paranoia.
Though I do check to see my baby son’s all right in his cot all the time. But I reckon all the constant reminders they give you about COT DEATH are enough to turn anyone paranoid about it :crazy_diz
By some people’s standards I smoke quite a lot of dope, but strangely never really seem to suffer from any paranoia.
Though I do check to see my baby son’s all right in his cot all the time. But I reckon all the constant reminders they give you about COT DEATH are enough to turn anyone paranoid about it :crazy_diz
TigerMoff wrote:Ah you must be the PV equivalent of SJ’s Dizzy.Never heard of it before. Made me laugh. Thought its quite obvious that you see her from the back and she looks 16 then you see her from the front and shes 64.
Aha age, now I get it. And feel a bit stupid too.
TigerMoff wrote:Ah you must be the PV equivalent of SJ’s Dizzy.Never heard of it before. Made me laugh. Thought its quite obvious that you see her from the back and she looks 16 then you see her from the front and shes 64.
Aha age, now I get it. And feel a bit stupid too.
Neither do I, but he’ll probably never return to the thread because by the time he gets back into work on Monday morning, SJ will be back up.
Tell you what… I’ll ask him for you and report back.
Neither do I, but he’ll probably never return to the thread because by the time he gets back into work on Monday morning, SJ will be back up.
Tell you what… I’ll ask him for you and report back.
globalloon wrote:i go to plenty of parties where there aren’t any wankers. where i work there aren’t any wankers. i don’t live with any wankers. there are lots of places and groups of people that don’t contain ignorant bigots… more and more of them in fact, as the rest of society evolves, the bigots will just get more and more sidelinedIt’s not hard to surround yourself exclusively with like-minded people though its it?
Doesn’t mean the rest of ’em aren’t feral.
Have you been down the city centre recently? A non-London one I mean? I was in a nightclub in Stirling in Scotland last year with several friends, 2 of whom are of Indian origin. We had to leave. I was actually afraid.
globalloon wrote:i go to plenty of parties where there aren’t any wankers. where i work there aren’t any wankers. i don’t live with any wankers. there are lots of places and groups of people that don’t contain ignorant bigots… more and more of them in fact, as the rest of society evolves, the bigots will just get more and more sidelinedIt’s not hard to surround yourself exclusively with like-minded people though its it?
Doesn’t mean the rest of ’em aren’t feral.
Have you been down the city centre recently? A non-London one I mean? I was in a nightclub in Stirling in Scotland last year with several friends, 2 of whom are of Indian origin. We had to leave. I was actually afraid.
Those are all absolutely rubbish animals.
Behold the Tibetan Fox, who looks upon you with disdain:
And the blobfish, who is unhappy at appearing in this thread:
Those are all absolutely rubbish animals.
Behold the Tibetan Fox, who looks upon you with disdain:
And the blobfish, who is unhappy at appearing in this thread:
april wrote:glad he has been charged the lieing bastard…..shame pete townsend who did exact same thing didnt get made a example an be locked up…..but i guess he paid off the judge or something….he looks like a nonse …so does this actor bloke……..sic fuks …should hang them …..raaaYeah fuckin sick fucks string em up hangings too good for em.
Canyoustayoutofthisthreadfromnowonpleasethanks.
april wrote:glad he has been charged the lieing bastard…..shame pete townsend who did exact same thing didnt get made a example an be locked up…..but i guess he paid off the judge or something….he looks like a nonse …so does this actor bloke……..sic fuks …should hang them …..raaaYeah fuckin sick fucks string em up hangings too good for em.
Canyoustayoutofthisthreadfromnowonpleasethanks.
Gott wrote:One thing that is going to be quite worrying is the arrival of new laws that make it illegal to look at or download stuff that is technically level 5 but is actually consensual..I know that it’s causing quite some concern in the S&M/Fetish scene given that a lot of the stuff that is passe to them could quite easily have jurors in tears.. but, it is consensual and that is the problem, one person’s meat being another’s poison..
The worrying thing is that in the name of protecting the innocent we could end up criminalising people and having ludicrous situations like the Bolton Seven again..
Well, it’s Level 1-5 (what does your ‘technically’ actually mean?) only if it involves children. And children can’t give consent, as you’re no doubt aware. If it’s adults, then it doesn’t qualify as child pornography full stop and as such wouldn’t be classified as 1-5.
I know about the concern amongst S&M-ers too, but I seriously doubt anyone would ever be convicted when consent could be proven, no matter how upsetting the material.
Bolton 7 were undoubtedly victimised for their homosexuality rather than S&M antics. And it all got overturned in the end, thus setting the precedent which will discourage any future silliness like that.
Gott wrote:One thing that is going to be quite worrying is the arrival of new laws that make it illegal to look at or download stuff that is technically level 5 but is actually consensual..I know that it’s causing quite some concern in the S&M/Fetish scene given that a lot of the stuff that is passe to them could quite easily have jurors in tears.. but, it is consensual and that is the problem, one person’s meat being another’s poison..
The worrying thing is that in the name of protecting the innocent we could end up criminalising people and having ludicrous situations like the Bolton Seven again..
Well, it’s Level 1-5 (what does your ‘technically’ actually mean?) only if it involves children. And children can’t give consent, as you’re no doubt aware. If it’s adults, then it doesn’t qualify as child pornography full stop and as such wouldn’t be classified as 1-5.
I know about the concern amongst S&M-ers too, but I seriously doubt anyone would ever be convicted when consent could be proven, no matter how upsetting the material.
Bolton 7 were undoubtedly victimised for their homosexuality rather than S&M antics. And it all got overturned in the end, thus setting the precedent which will discourage any future silliness like that.
Well, one-off oddities maybe, like I said. Then there was that documentary with executions too wasn’t there?
But Wikipedia tells me FOD were collections of (some faked) pre-recorded deaths, filmed not directly for the series itself. i.e., not Snuff as an abduct someone off the streets and kill them on camera type thing. Which is what I always thought it was supposed to be.
It depends on your definition of Snuff I suppose.
Well, one-off oddities maybe, like I said. Then there was that documentary with executions too wasn’t there?
But Wikipedia tells me FOD were collections of (some faked) pre-recorded deaths, filmed not directly for the series itself. i.e., not Snuff as an abduct someone off the streets and kill them on camera type thing. Which is what I always thought it was supposed to be.
It depends on your definition of Snuff I suppose.
T.I.G wrote:a boring chat about current affairs with a couple of overly PC wankers trying to be clever (PV)I don’t come on here much at all, so I shouldn’t comment too much. But I did see this little gem further up this very thread:
boothy wrote:quite a few of them are annoyingly conservative as well… which says more about boothy (and then possibly PV) than about the people on SJ, I reckon. He does go on to say something about racism though, which is somewhat more defensible.
But anyway, it’s all good. This is a nice place, and thanks PV for letting us squat here for a few days! (See we can be nice too)
T.I.G wrote:a boring chat about current affairs with a couple of overly PC wankers trying to be clever (PV)I don’t come on here much at all, so I shouldn’t comment too much. But I did see this little gem further up this very thread:
boothy wrote:quite a few of them are annoyingly conservative as well… which says more about boothy (and then possibly PV) than about the people on SJ, I reckon. He does go on to say something about racism though, which is somewhat more defensible.
But anyway, it’s all good. This is a nice place, and thanks PV for letting us squat here for a few days! (See we can be nice too)
Yeah Help was good too. In fact, I’m a bit of a Chris Langham fan. (Perhaps I should say ‘was a fan’. I wouldn’t want to appear to be supporting a ‘vert)
@Hyb – I’ve never quite believed in Snuff films. As a genuine genre I mean. As an occasional oddity perhaps, but I don’t think there are places you can go to browse the shelves. Well, I’ve never found one anyway :crazy:Yeah Help was good too. In fact, I’m a bit of a Chris Langham fan. (Perhaps I should say ‘was a fan’. I wouldn’t want to appear to be supporting a ‘vert)
@Hyb – I’ve never quite believed in Snuff films. As a genuine genre I mean. As an occasional oddity perhaps, but I don’t think there are places you can go to browse the shelves. Well, I’ve never found one anyway :crazy:I’ve never been offended by anything other than the poor grammar and spelling on SJ.
Not too keen on dead cats and coprophelia and all that, but then I’ve been on the internet a long time. Ogrish, Rotten.com, Goatse and what have you.
I like SJ. Though I do wish some people would grow up a bit. DC was the nuts back in the day though. I first became a computer nerdling when I found out about DC.
