[Gott]

farmerwardy wrote:

you sound like a bunch of grumpy scottsman.
(oh no hes being abusing towards scotts, shock horror)

If you’re going to bandy about racist insults at least do so with the correct language..

Firstly, change “scottsman” into “Scotsmen” the plural proper noun with a capital and secondly “scotts” should be “Scots” – again, it’s a proper noun form so it requires a capital letter at the start.

You should be ashamed, having to have yer mither tongue explained to ye by an Albanach.. (and I won’t even begin on your lack of apostrophes)

[Gott]

farmerwardy wrote:

you sound like a bunch of grumpy scottsman.
(oh no hes being abusing towards scotts, shock horror)

If you’re going to bandy about racist insults at least do so with the correct language..

Firstly, change “scottsman” into “Scotsmen” the plural proper noun with a capital and secondly “scotts” should be “Scots” – again, it’s a proper noun form so it requires a capital letter at the start.

You should be ashamed, having to have yer mither tongue explained to ye by an Albanach.. (and I won’t even begin on your lack of apostrophes)

[Gott]

tilting wrote:

Well, one-off oddities maybe, like I said. Then there was that documentary with executions too wasn’t there?

But Wikipedia tells me FOD were collections of (some faked) pre-recorded deaths, filmed not directly for the series itself. i.e., not Snuff as an abduct someone off the streets and kill them on camera type thing. Which is what I always thought it was supposed to be.

It depends on your definition of Snuff I suppose.

I’ve always thought that snuff was a bit of an urban myth to be honest..

quoteth Wiki

“The most common definition of a snuff film is of a motion picture showing the actual murder of a human being that is produced, perpetrated, and distributed solely for the purpose of profit. This definition thereby excludes recordings of murders caught by accident, and videotapes of actual murders that were never intended to be released as entertainment films. Given these criteria, the existence of snuff films is highly questionable, and commercial snuff films have long been relegated by skeptics to the realm of urban legend and moral panic. To date, no film generally accepted as fitting this definition has been found.[“

[Gott]

tilting wrote:

Well, one-off oddities maybe, like I said. Then there was that documentary with executions too wasn’t there?

But Wikipedia tells me FOD were collections of (some faked) pre-recorded deaths, filmed not directly for the series itself. i.e., not Snuff as an abduct someone off the streets and kill them on camera type thing. Which is what I always thought it was supposed to be.

It depends on your definition of Snuff I suppose.

I’ve always thought that snuff was a bit of an urban myth to be honest..

quoteth Wiki

“The most common definition of a snuff film is of a motion picture showing the actual murder of a human being that is produced, perpetrated, and distributed solely for the purpose of profit. This definition thereby excludes recordings of murders caught by accident, and videotapes of actual murders that were never intended to be released as entertainment films. Given these criteria, the existence of snuff films is highly questionable, and commercial snuff films have long been relegated by skeptics to the realm of urban legend and moral panic. To date, no film generally accepted as fitting this definition has been found.[“

[Gott]

One thing that is going to be quite worrying is the arrival of new laws that make it illegal to look at or download stuff that is technically level 5 but is actually consensual..

I know that it’s causing quite some concern in the S&M/Fetish scene given that a lot of the stuff that is passe to them could quite easily have jurors in tears.. but, it is consensual and that is the problem, one person’s meat being another’s poison..

The worrying thing is that in the name of protecting the innocent we could end up criminalising people and having ludicrous situations like the Bolton Seven again..

There’s even debate going on right now as to whether virtual noncery is actualy noncery as such, with things like Second Life and that getting quite a lot of flak for letting people indulge in “age play”, but again, there’s serious contradictions here, for what about those that get their rocks off on being “babies”, if it becomes ilegal for someone to pretend to be another age or that, then that form of behaviour is also going to be made illegal too.. and that’s going to look great in court..

“Yes M’lud, we arrested the accused dressed in a dirty diaper, with serious nappy rash and biting on an oversized teething ring..”

[Gott]

One thing that is going to be quite worrying is the arrival of new laws that make it illegal to look at or download stuff that is technically level 5 but is actually consensual..

I know that it’s causing quite some concern in the S&M/Fetish scene given that a lot of the stuff that is passe to them could quite easily have jurors in tears.. but, it is consensual and that is the problem, one person’s meat being another’s poison..

The worrying thing is that in the name of protecting the innocent we could end up criminalising people and having ludicrous situations like the Bolton Seven again..

There’s even debate going on right now as to whether virtual noncery is actualy noncery as such, with things like Second Life and that getting quite a lot of flak for letting people indulge in “age play”, but again, there’s serious contradictions here, for what about those that get their rocks off on being “babies”, if it becomes ilegal for someone to pretend to be another age or that, then that form of behaviour is also going to be made illegal too.. and that’s going to look great in court..

“Yes M’lud, we arrested the accused dressed in a dirty diaper, with serious nappy rash and biting on an oversized teething ring..”

[Author]

Posts