- This topic has 15 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated February 24, 2005 at 5:37 pm by Andy_Aztek.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 23, 2005 at 9:04 am #1036216General Lighting wrote:Its also very interesting just how many “pro-hunting/ tory middle england” types (mostly white people from affluent parts of England!) advocate the return of capital punishment to the UK and/or say “why don’t we chop off thieves hands?”
Well it seams to work in Saudi.
Maybe that is one solution to londons current mugger problem. certainly is a powerful deterant.February 23, 2005 at 9:20 am #1064297AnonymousI once got mugged in Kings Cross, if i ever catch that toe rag i will personally chop his dick off!
Maybe Capital punishment for THOSE types of crimes would be a good idea!
scottsummers
February 23, 2005 at 9:29 am #1064309scottsummers wrote:I once got mugged in Kings Cross, if i ever catch that toe rag i will personally chop his dick off!Maybe Capital punishment for THOSE types of crimes would be a good idea!
scottsummers
Not adviseable. those charactors are serious people and aint worth fucking with. They will be out in london everyweek end at the party with the least sucurity, as was proved this weekend. you may be able to kick them out of a party once but this will only lead to grudges as they will be back the next weekend or they will wait outside the venue. cunts. pure evil cunts.
February 23, 2005 at 11:30 am #1064298Andy – dunno if you’re talking about another party but the main one last weekend was TOM?
they have very good and effective security which can stand up to the London gangs and is reducing the number of incidents – but even then some happened (which ties in with what you are saying about how evil they are). It seems that some elements see this security as a challenge rather than a deterrent…
Unfortunately that is probably about as good as it is ever going to get in London…
February 23, 2005 at 11:41 am #1064299The UK had capital punishment for street robberies and even property theft until the early 1900s.
It was stopped as it had actually caused the murder/manslaughter rate to go through the roof – many of those determined to use violence to obtain property decided that as they would go to the gallows it didn’t matter if they killed their victims…..
I can understand the desire for violent reprisals against violent criminals – but there are obvious dangers of taking the law into your own hands is
- you might get nicked as well and will do about 5-10 years inside depending on severity (you may also get put in a slammer which may contain friends of the person you did over!)
- even violent scum have friends, relatives and parents who will also be looking out for revenge, and may also try to take the fight to your family as well. ( a lad in SE London recently had his family home burned out after a gang fight and his kid brothers were killed). Feuds that last across generations have started this way.
February 23, 2005 at 4:03 pm #1064305Anonymousi’ve been mugged 8 times all together (including attempts) and while it has scetched me out for a while after the event, it also is kind of a releif. in our society, i expect to be mugged (and always have) especially wandering around with jesus hair in a kaftan (as i do occasionally) i look like the sort of bloke who’d turn their cheek, and i am. so i look like a victim basically. if you want to read some proper dark shit, check out:
http://partyvibe.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2333i’m not a big fan of religion, but buddhism seems the nearest to good i can see. and their reaction to the chinese invasion (which is now complete, tibet no longer exists) is a beacon of light to me. they would not fight their agressors, not because they didn’t think they could manage it (which they couldnt) or for any reason other than they dont beleive in violence, and do beleive in karma. they recon that the cycles of life will repay the tibeteans and get back at the chinese, if that is what is meant to be. they just went on a mission to say to loads of other countries “look at what is happening to us”. you can say they failed, but i think they have won. they may have been slaugtered, but not as much as if they’d gone to war. they still have their integrity. they have not been broken.
bit random, i know, but it applies. when i get mugged, i’m just glad that i am some one with enough to steal, and not someone who is forced to steal due to poverty or addiction. i think they have a worse life than me, and truly beleive that what they need are oppotunity and rehabilitation, not punishment. if we had capital punishment i’d move or become militant. society is defined by its laws. i feel ill at ease with 80% of imprisonments, and the structure of the ob is bad enough, without descending furthur into a more self destructive and counterproductive mode of living.
bottom line: property and money doesnt mean shit. life and freedom does.
rant over.
February 23, 2005 at 4:29 pm #1064300I tend to look at things from a slightly pragmatic POV – I will be brutally honest and think that those who live by violence have forfeited at least some of their rights to freedom.
There are also those people who can never be rehabilitated; if we are not to have capital punishment they should stay in prison or hospital.
There they can be used for various clinical trials by the NHS and pay their dues that way; on death their body and internal organs should be available for research and transplant -there is always a demand for cadavers for use in teaching hospitals and similar places.
Although this (human experiments) has echos of certain authoritarian régimes I quite frankly can’t see a problem; the sort of trials I refer to are no different from those people voluntarily take part in and during these trials the medical profession may even find a reason why they committed the violent crime in the first place; maybe even a way of stopping future generations from doing so.
If someone approaches me with violence I won’t put up with it without a struggle (I assume they would be happy to kill me and react accordingly); it may mean I take a few knocks if there is more than 1 person (happened recently) but my main priority is getting to safety yet not being a pushover…
there are some real scum about these days, people who would hurt or kill just for fun and aren’t even interested in the property. If you look on crime reports on the local news you see a fair amount of incidents where people are jacked, done over and nothing is stolen (
But I am sensible enough to know a lot of the macho fantasies are just that – fantasies and if taken through to reality would have very negative effects. For instance I could have a knife or gun – but it wouldn’t solve much – I’d end up doing time and still have to watch my back when I came out.
Why should I fuck up my life for scum like that? they are not worth it.
And what are we going to do about them at parties? they are quite simply fucking up all events in some city areas and keeping good people away.
February 23, 2005 at 4:46 pm #1064306Anonymousi think a distinction has to be made between threatening someone to get their cash, and actually hurting them. if someone intimidates me well enough and i have some small cash (under £20) or a phone, i’ll quite happily give it up. means nothing to me. but if someone physically abuses me, thats assault, and a different matter. no one should have to cope with that.
for me the only reason for incarcerating someone is if you cannot realisically have them in your society. i think this is only applicable for murder, rape, gbh, and repeat offenders of assault, etc.
we are all part of society, and one of the reasons people are like that is because society doesn’t work too wel, and is horrifically bias to the rich. in a way, i see being robbed or burgled as a wanker tax, for not doing my bit to prevent these people having to resort to extreme measures.
yes, there are some people who arent that interested in cash and are psychpathic, that is they just want to cause other people pain. but it is a mental condition which arises from a cetain life. to let people get to such a deluded and sorry state, and then lock them up when they act accordingly seems perverse at least, to me.
as for the crews who frequent london parties, there just needs to be more organisation by the crews to expect and deal with trouble. another problem is the london mentality, of not giving a fucking shit about anyone else but yourself, a total lack of solidarity to your fellow man. mugging happen in parties because people let them. in our parties, everyone knows whos side theyre on, and looks out for one another. there is unity and respect. that is missing from cities, and it is the fault of our rullers and our media. and all the little “its not my problem crew” who should all be rounded up and subjected to every horror they have turned a blind eye to.
February 23, 2005 at 5:19 pm #1064301USE wrote:as for the crews who frequent london parties, there just needs to be more organisation by the crews to expect and deal with trouble. another problem is the london mentality, of not giving a fucking shit about anyone else but yourself, a total lack of solidarity to your fellow man. mugging happen in parties because people let them. in our parties, everyone knows whos side theyre on, and looks out for one another. there is unity and respect. that is missing from cities, and it is the fault of our rullers and our media. and all the little “its not my problem crew” who should all be rounded up and subjected to every horror they have turned a blind eye to.I was born in London and spent much of my life there. There is some solidarity there, but in some areas parts of society has in fact broken down and there is a culture of crime,fighting and violence (which is though as you say caused by poverty).
London party crews have already taken steps to try and stop this, but TBH many ignored the problem for way too long (it was starting to get bad in the mid 1990s!) and now they are having to deal with it full-on.
But even if your area does not yet need to deploy “friendly bouncers”, there is still a need for vigilance at all free parties.
Although parties outside London (bumpkin parties) have less trouble, this is only because the people there are a bit more affluent (many can afford to run motor cars and have jobs etc) and have their own phones/cash, they see no need to mug each other!
There are incidents at bumpkin parties – often “domestics” – arguments between former friends and sometimes intimate partners or problems fuelled by jealousy which sadly increasingly get brought to parties. I actually used the “lord of the flies” analogy a year ago to relate to situations at the Ridgeway parties that season!
But in most cases ketamine and other stuff stops the arguments erupting into fisticuffs (there’s one positive use for it I suppose…)
Sadly I see a lot of posts on other messageboards (not just party ones) – that indicate many young men in particular find violence seductive and are more prepared than even before to settle their differences that way (this was actiually a result in a grauniad/observer readers poll on the attitude of men over the generations – hardly a newspaper popular with thugs!).
Some opinions expressed give me the impression people find violence at raves a source of entertainment (provided of course they are not the ones being done over!) and they would be happy to have something resembling “the litten tree with ketamine” – not sure if thats the best attitude for a supposedly progressive scene.
February 23, 2005 at 5:25 pm #1064308Andy_Aztek wrote:Not adviseable. those charactors are serious people and aint worth fucking with. They will be out in london everyweek end at the party with the least sucurity, as was proved this weekend. you may be able to kick them out of a party once but this will only lead to grudges as they will be back the next weekend or they will wait outside the venue. cunts. pure evil cunts.yes, pure evil cunts, and probably not because of addiction or money troubles but because they are just evil. There’s not a fat lot they would be able to do without any hands. All though chopping off peoples limbs is a bit extreme, but if it prevents inocent people being vicously attacked and sometimes killed then maybe IT IS a solution ????????
February 23, 2005 at 5:45 pm #1064302NRGboy wrote:yes, pure evil cunts, and probably not because of addiction or money troubles but because they are just evil. There’s not a fat lot they would be able to do without any hands. All though chopping off peoples limbs is a bit extreme, but if it prevents inocent people being vicously attacked and sometimes killed then maybe IT IS a solution ????????this already sometimes happens in London amongst the criminal fraternity – maybe not whole hands but a few fingers etc, someone ( a prolific burglar) was actually crucified (nails and all) in Hillingdon, and doused in petrol (not sure if he was actually burned, but petrol is corrosive to the skin even if not lit.
In Northern Ireland there are many documented instances of the paramilitaries dealing with “scallies/chavs” by putting a few pistol rounds into their kneecaps!
But of course the NHS ends up patching up these people (the injuries are often explained away as industrial injuries) – everyone else pick up the cost (as the injured person can often never get a decent job) – often brothers and associates of the injured person will take the fight back to those who did him over. other innocent family members are caught up in these wars (or complete randoms who where the gang picks the wrong house/person – happens fairly often!)
What it doesn’t stop is the violence. This escalates for evermore.
Someone with no hands could get a nasty sharp hook fitted and use those to slash at people.. pirates did and still do this…
you might as well just have shot them TBH
If the use of violence really stopped further violence, we could all be having fucking excellent parties in a “free democratic” Iraq by now (it would be a damn sight warmer for one thing!)
February 23, 2005 at 6:12 pm #1064307Anonymouscheck this out…got it of sj:
Knife terror on London bus
Daily Mail Reporter23 February 2005
It was a routine Monday morning bus journey – until this well-built youth headed towards the rear seats, his outstretched hand gripping a knife.
His target was the mobile phone owned by another passenger, and to get it the attacker repeatedly stabbed his victim, inflicting terrible injuries. A woman sitting just a couple of feet away was clearly terrified by the horror unfolding in front of her but was trapped.
She ended up cowering in the corner of the No 133 bus to save herself from the knifeman.
Other passengers were able to flee from the top deck, their screams alerting the driver.
He stopped the vehicle, called help and the victim was taken to hospital. But the attacker escaped and is still on the loose.
The 21-year-old victim’s ordeal – captured on CCTV cameras – left him with deep wounds to his neck and head from the 5in knife.
One scar on his neck is 4in long and the tendons on his left hand were severed.
Detective Sergeant John Freeman said the attack in Kennington, South London, was ‘ferocious and vicious’.
He added: ‘The victim was very lucky not to have died. This could have been a murder investigation.
‘This was an extremely violent attack with a large knife which resulted in injuries which could have cost this man his life.
‘The victim said his attacker was trying to steal his phone and that he had never met him before so it looks like the motive was robbery.
‘But it is very unusual to have a daylight robbery on a packed bus.’
Police need witnesses to the attack at 11.50am on February 7 in Kennington Park Road. Detective Sergeant Freeman added: ‘From the CCTV images, you can see there were a number of people on board but everyone decamped sharpish after the attack.
‘It would have been very frightening for everyone on board.
‘No one has come forward but we are appealing for any witness.’
The attacker was described as black, in his late teens, wearing a dark blue anorak, dark trousers and a beenie hat.
dunno what to make of this…to my idealisitc mind, i would say that the attacker is a psychopath who should have been treated in a mental insitution (not that they work, but are the right idea). it is the fault of the government for not providing the resources to identify and treat such mentally unstable people.
mmm…..daily mail-a-rific
February 23, 2005 at 8:28 pm #1064310NRGboy wrote:yes, pure evil cunts, and probably not because of addiction or money troubles but because they are just evil. There’s not a fat lot they would be able to do without any hands. All though chopping off peoples limbs is a bit extreme, but if it prevents inocent people being vicously attacked and sometimes killed then maybe IT IS a solution ????????alot of them dont do drugs. and not technicly need the money to survive. some do it for fun. (so im told) i gather its their culture.
yes GL, the munt parties are so much safer. but even their parties are not trouble free. although i hear the muggers got more than they bargined for and were removed from the party.
& i was more joking about corpral punishment than anything.
February 24, 2005 at 11:18 am #1064303Andy_Aztek wrote:alot of them dont do drugs. and not technicly need the money to survive. some do it for fun. (so im told) i gather its their culture.yes GL, the munt parties are so much safer. but even their parties are not trouble free. although i hear the muggers got more than they bargined for and were removed from the party.
You are quite right about the culture bit – its the “hard man” culture that has been part of London life for many years in some areas. In some cases they do not even particularly want the phones, money etc!
This was TBH happening even in the early 90s; people didn’t get jacked for their phones that often; but simply only because there weren’t many phones to nick! I do think though that the proportion of scum is slowly increasing in some big city areas (not just London)- due to the breakdown of civil society in some regions.
Even former “safe havens” such as Reading have had problems, although they have been nipped in the bud by taking quick action, and the fact that many people know one another.
There are those who attend events (both free and licensed) merely for the buzz creating fear amongst others, and making them expect to see violence at parties.
From many of the posts I saw on DC and SJ it appears they are actually succeeding in doing so. Other reports mention these scum often fight amongst themselves as much as try to jack people!
They were indeed removed from TOM (and Scotland Yard were waiting for them outside!) ; OTOH I don’t think they are that stupid and know exactly what the score is.
Scum like that have destroyed commercial licensed events, which have large bulky security staff in some number equipped with personal radios and floor plans, incident training – people who can patrol a territory to the same standard as a military unit.
Munt have had security for months, even then scum still try to challenge it (by attempting to enter through windows, fire exits etc). Bear in mind preventing them doing so also involves blocking a fire-exit 🙁
Worse still last weeks events with the cops will no doubt lead to word on the estate “the people who organise raves are grasses” – I expect it was a pure coincidence cops were there (perhaps a neighbour complained) at the time the robbers were ejected; but you know what i mean.
I know many of the ToM crew and they are sound (and very brave for dealing with this), I hope things do not get too heavy for them in the future.
It must be fairly soul-destroying for London rigs to have to put up with this every weekend; but thats what happens when they collectively ignore or refuse to address a problem at the start. The (trained) security should have been there in the mid 90s
And some people are not joking about corporal punishment; in the mid 90s some London parties did have vigilanté types who dealt with the muggers or anyone they “thought” was misbehaving, they would be taken round the back and done over. This didn’t stop the violence – it often just turned it into a “hit and run away” type incident or led to reprisal attacks,and the vigilantés were often as bad as the muggers themselves (many thought they were fighting for dealing turf as well)
I think people from outside London may still have the chance to learn from the mistakes made though…
February 24, 2005 at 3:50 pm #1064304Grim.
I have a lot of admiration for TOM addressing this problem. I don’t think I could handle the paranoia.
Secondly, I don’t agree with reprissal attacks for the very reason GL has stated. In almost all cases the other party has to get their own back and they usually come back at you with more psychopathic people than you can muster yourself.
As for the bus story, it is clearly the actions of someone who has mental health issues….. or is it someone getting their own back for something? Most victims of violent incidents (in my town anyway) eventually confess that they knew the attacker.
Either that or the guy was on large amounts of crack or acid. Acid used to be one of my fave drugs and during my years i’ve seen a few people get violent on it not realising quite what they are doing as everything plays out in a surreal mindset.
February 24, 2005 at 5:37 pm #1064311General Lighting wrote:From many of the posts I saw on DC and SJ it appears they are actually succeeding in doing so. Other reports mention these scum often fight amongst themselves as much as try to jack people!Worse still last weeks events with the cops will no doubt lead to word on the estate “the people who organise raves are grasses” – I expect it was a pure coincidence cops were there (perhaps a neighbour complained) at the time the robbers were ejected; but you know what i mean.
Yea, ive wittnessed them start on each other. three of them mugged my mate, i tried gettin out the room to get help but was blocked in by some rudegirls, so i had to go back and try to help my mate, one asked me to get my phone out, whilst i was doing this the other dipped my pocket for my wallet, gezza with my phones saw, and knocked the wallet out of his hand, the two pushed each other saying “yo blad, why you treatin me like dat” “i didnt wonna do it like that”….fuck knows what they ment. i picked up my wallet and got out of there closely followed by my mate.
I hear ToM have recieved death threats after the weekends event. and you would expect it to be coincidence. hopefully nothing will come of this though.
munt do VERY well not to let the skum win and it does seam like they have created a safe space to party in london. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.